Mad Idea (Media) Perceptions

I took a deep breath and it’s quite shocking news of our chairman Raju’s confession about all his fakeness and cook books. Series of actions from the second rate television channels and third rate newspapers made me really upset, about their portrayal of the Incident. One of the very amateur website [Economic Times] leased our company news and gave fonts to their bogus imaginations. Momentary updates with all pessimistic perceptions and ornamental stories. First of everything they should know the difference between "A CEO as a Person" and "A Company as an Employee".

Competitor firms enjoyed the show and gave stupid interviews with self-advertisements and useless assumptions. No news to touch the hope of employees and stakeholders. First they need to understand, it’s only the top management’s mistakes and all the wrong goings were very top level. It’s again the employees and their family should feel the pain and gossips. One thing for the media and people is, “When someone is good, they hold them in their head and same is bad, they throw on foot”. You don’t want to celebrate and chase out. They need to know they are the only middle tier between people and the picture. Each of their words should be true and their views should be in a good perceptive. They made a glamorous business for a while and it really seemed that they waited for this bad show to happen.

One amateur incident is when; Raju was arrested for the interrogation. All the media persons just waited and chased the policemen and guards, especially the running cars. Without any coverage, just they returned back, as they should know, there will be a tight security. Nowadays the media is too much stealing the show and its all waste of time. I heard about several restrictions to them from the Government, in view with the recent Terrorists attacks in Mumbai. Over coverage of some media, on that incident, helped the terrorists to continue their job well. The new amendment says many blocks for the live coverage on under- pressure happenings. I accept and welcome the good goings about them, but it should not be overdose and ill-treat victimized people. They should give good analysis, focused perceptions, consoling thoughts, unless a turmoil debate and havoc interviews.